DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S,. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JDR
Docket No: 11606-14
17 March 2015
Dear G7
This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request
dated 13 October 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and
were advised in our letter of 8 May 1989 that your application
had been denied.
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application and any material submitted in support of
your application.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that the statements you provided,
even though not previously considered by the Board, were
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. A review of your recent application reveals
that again your request must be denied. In this regard, the
Board found that your contentions are insufficient to warrant
further consideration in your case. In the absence of
sufficient material evidence for reconsideration, the decision
of the Board is final, and your only recourse would be to
initiate action, at no cost to the Board, to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O’ NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11076 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11689 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12100 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. ~ After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statement you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11277 14
In this regard, your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of your recent application reveals that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12825 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 4 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided and assertion of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) asa reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2170 15_Redacted
Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR2170 15_Redacted
Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1165 14
on S November 2013, You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter of 23 October 2013, that your application had been denied. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 24 February 2015. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13252 14
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2390 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 18 March 2015. material submitted in support of your application, and your husband’s prior case file. husband’s mental disorder, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error or injustice.